Dear Patrick,
I kicked you out of 2.0 for two reasons.
1) your passive/aggressive, nonstop insinuations that Maury was a crypto-Nazi.
If that were true, don't you think he would have been sympathetic to The Process? Duuuhhh....
And it's funny how you never pull that shit on Dana. No, you found out I didn't like it so you kept doing it. That's trolling 101.
2) Leash made a really poor, disrespectful decision without consulting the other mods. I figured my days were numbered after that so I made some decisions of my own. Totally worth it, I don't regret a thing.
Die mad, shithead,
N
Dear Leash,
If you are in as poor health as you claim, then I don't recommend stirring up drama on the internet. Nothing good can come of it.
That goes for your "friends" too - leave her alone. Stop revving her up, you pieces of shit. She's sick, remember?
And no, I'm not telling you where I live.
1) I'm sure your "friends" know anyway, seeing as how they did a background check on me. Fucking freaks.
2) why would I let you pick me up? You have brain fog, or at least you claim you do. So no, I'm not getting in a car with you driving. Duuuuhhhh....
Also, I never told anyone I got kicked out over Neo's book lol. I got kicked out for being an asshole, and proud of it.
As for trying to break up any bro-mance between me and Tom Dexter, we don't have one. We trust each other about as far as we can throw one another.
But he does keep me honest, he writes clearly, he puts thought into his comments, and so I approve them. Not all of them. Sometimes I want things to calm down so I don't approve any heated back-and-forths. You know, keeping things civil, like a mod should do.
Be well,
N
Nathan,
ReplyDeleteIs my continued existence on the fringes (for now...) of the SoS investigation still a thorn in the side of all the "opposing factions" inside the big Psycho Circus tent?
Too fucking bad for them.
They ought to be counting their lucky stars that I am taking my time with MY book...otherwise ALL their corruption would be on display already.
As to comments I make here...well, you certainly didn't lie regarding the volume posted...you've squashed a couple gems if I recall correctly, if I do say so myself, presumably to keep the peace.
And that's no skin off my nose... certainly not something I'd get worked up over.
Dyer's Little Squeezetoy, his dog Toto, Limp Lorenzo, Li'l Walnuts the Gardener's Apprentice, the British Witch, Scrappy Doo and a myriad of other hangers-on and sycophants...that sound they hear ringing in their ears?
It's the countdown clock to their time being up...as it should be.
And if Carl Denaro has any ethics left in him at all, AT ALL, he'll start telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...
In God we Trust.
TD
Btw, I still have friends in 2.0. Do you see me whining on their social media about what a couple of dicks you two are? No. But you had to unload your sob sister stories on my friend Dana's Twitter because her and Parker said my name and it gave you PTSD or something.
ReplyDelete@Nathan
ReplyDeleteWow. I'm glad I trusted my intuition and never reached out to "Leash".
What is wrong with these people?
"Trust as far as I can throw him". Lol. Sounds like you are as disallusioned with this community as myself.
I got nothing personal against the guy. And I look forward to reading his book (I just hope I'm not in it lol!!).
DeleteAs for a lot of these other fucking dummies in the "community", they want you to "keep an open mind" but when you don't bend the knee to Neo and Wheat they get all pissed off. Don't take my word for it.
Sorry, I forgot to answer your question.
DeleteWhat's wrong with these people? A variety of things.
For example, say what you will about Josh Zeman's documentary, but it DID guarantee more eyes on the case. That is a big part of the problem right there, especially when certain people have things to hide.
I could go on and on but I bet you've already figured a lot of it out for yourself.
@nathan
DeleteYou could say so. My experience has been less than fantastic as you know from my personal emails to you, examples included. Although I've held a lot back.
My problem with this community is it is infested with double and triple agents, a bunch of Looky Lous with nothing solid to offer related to analysis or investigation skills, others that are in it for the sheer sake of networking and saying they gained access to files, narcissist tendancies to hear their own voices, blah blah blah.
Then so many people just don't give an eff about protecting witnesses, sources, associates, suspects.
Pretty tired of seeing Carl get attacked, too. And David Berkowitz.
But at least many of us are on the same page: a complex criminal network with multiple people involved in the shootings. Maybe we all need to find common ground and move forward. . .
Sorry you mean ass got kicked out of 2.0. If it makes you feel better, I tried to join after getting a text from Carl about someone who tried to join that was relevant for research. I reopened my FB account, tried joining multiple times, and kept getting turned down. Likely by the British Witch. Carl finally had to reach out to an administrator to get me in. Then I saw the British Witch had shit talked me in welcoming comments.
I don't know her. So I'm assuming she did it based on a one sided story or stories. Whatever. Im not here to make friends. I guess that is appropriate for her considering she also thinks there was only one shooter.
I do like Carl. And quite a few others. But some of these dingdongs are just shitbags and/or dead weight.
DeleteI don’t even like doing these Housekeeping posts. I like discussing the case most of all because it’s still quite fascinating. But sometimes Housekeeping posts are a necessary evil, I suppose.
Seems there are quite a few people in the SoS researching world, whether they are plants monitoring and/or steering the action to protect certain secrets, or just bad actors amusing themselves, who have a raging case of TDDS.
DeleteThe number of times I've been told "Why don't you start a YouTube channel, huh? You just want to hate on Manny/Neo/Carl/Max/Mike/Professor Dad..." or whomever the person is peddling faulty intel to easily led rubes who haven't followed the case for DECADES and don't know any better, is immense at this point.
And my response to them will never change...I don't need to become a YouTube sensation to call out bullshit when I see it.
The only thing I care about is the true story, and I don't care who disseminates the truth, my best friend or worst enemy...as long as it is the truth.
As far as Carl goes, I'm basically indifferent to him on a personal level at this point.
It was his actions (possibly at the urging of others) that destroyed the promise of what the SoS FB groups could have been.
He needs to own that, like him or not.
TD
The constant demands from certain bad actors (“where’s your shows/let’s debate!) is just gross to me.
DeleteImagine you’re a survivor. Are you going to sit there and go, “honey, I’m switching it over to YouTube, these guys are FINALLY debating my case!!” Hell no.
I’m not running a campaign to win the title King of Sam and I don’t owe people with zero credibility a damn thing.
Head’s up.
DeleteFrom what I gather, I’m not the only one whose personal info has been compromised.
Nathan,
DeleteI'm not concerned. I haven't exactly been hiding.
I've actually had a couple knocks on my door over the last year where things I mentioned on FB and X were repeated back to me, and a relative was approached with malicious intent...
My friends in Brooklyn know what to do if anything happens to me or mine.
TD
Based and FAFO pilled.
Delete@TD
DeleteOh, I’m sure I’m just being paranoid.
Nevermind you, the person I spoke to earlier (see latest post) the other one two weeks ago, all the girls who spoke up about harassment…
Nathan,
DeleteA little paranoia is sometimes a good thing...contingencies are never a waste of time...and the 2nd Amendment is our friend.
TD
Honestly, if it was just me, I’d chalk it up to unfounded paranoia. But a pattern is a pattern.
DeleteAfter Max alleged that he almost lost his job over this shit and another one’s wife received a bunch of nasty shit in the mail, I kept personal deets to myself.
Btw, I was informed about a month ago that there is ANOTHER ONE who blew in via Manny’s YouTube channel that has also been doing background checks on other researchers. He doesn’t study the case, he doesn’t look into suspects and whatnot, just people like us. I’m not kidding.
DeleteThose damn patterns, man….
@Nathan
ReplyDeleteOk. A specific individual in this community is officially on notice.
Recording Phone Calls and Conversations Under the Law: 50-State Survey
People and businesses may have legitimate reasons for recording phone calls or other conversations in various circumstances. Since this activity raises privacy concerns, most states have enacted laws that describe who must consent to a recording, often called an “interception.” A majority of states require only one-party consent. This means that a party to the conversation can record it without getting the consent of anyone else, while a non-party can record it if they get consent from just one party. In contrast, a smaller group of states requires all-party consent. This means that everyone involved in the conversation must consent to the recording.
The consent rules tend to contain some narrow exceptions. These may involve certain law enforcement activities or emergency responses, among others. Furthermore, some states require consent only in situations involving a reasonable expectation of privacy.
The main federal law on this topic is 18 U.S. Code Section 2511, which prohibits intentionally intercepting any wire, oral, or electronic communication. This generally carries up to five years of imprisonment. (Meanwhile, Section 2520 provides for civil damages.) However, the law does not apply when one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception, unless the communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing a "criminal" or "tortious act" in violation of federal law or the law of any state. In other words, this is a one-party consent statute, like the laws in most states.
Violating a state law also may lead to severe penalties, potentially including years in prison. Thus, anyone considering recording a conversation should understand what the law in the state at issue requires. If a phone call extends across state lines, "they may want to comply with the most restrictive law to avoid a risk of liability." (Courts in different states have reached different conclusions about which law should apply in these cases.)
https://www.justia.com/50-state-surveys/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations/
New York is a one-party consent state, which means that you can record a conversation if you are a party to the conversation or if you have permission from one of the parties:
You are physically in New York and are taking part in the conversation.
You have permission from one of the parties in the conversation.
This applies to both phone calls and in-person conversations.
"However, you should be cautious when recording conversations involving people in multiple states, as other states may have different rules:"
If parties in multiple states are involved, a court is likely to apply federal law.
"If there is a conflict between the laws of two states, a court will decide which to apply."
"You should reach out to an attorney experienced in this area before recording a conversation where others are unaware. "
New York Penal Law Section 250.05 prohibits unlawfully engaging in wiretapping, mechanical overhearing of a conversation, or intercepting or accessing an electronic communication. This is a class E felony, which carries a minimum term of 1-1.33 years of imprisonment.
While I'll freely admit to recording calls when red flags are raised, have done it periodically since spring 2023, I only do it then. Which is why I prefer to keep everything in writing. No miscommunication that way.
This particular individual who likes to record people on a regular basis repeatedly BEGGED me not to record him. I have it on recording. Sorry not sorry. Why? Because everyone will see him for EXACTLY who he is. Oof. I am SO DISGUSTED WITH THESE PEOPLE!