Spec-u-la-tive

I'm fairly certain we all know what the word "speculative" means. We do. Over there in that chamber of farts known as the Manny Grossman YouTube channel, I'm not so sure. 

Just to make sure we're all on the same page, and because Manny is an avid reader of this blog, I'm going to let Mirriam-Webster give the definition of speculative (as always, click to enlarge):

 

The first definition is the one we're after, in this instance. Especially the part about "theoretical rather than demonstrable"

As we discussed in the previous post, Manny has come up with a new racket to own the Terry Heads- he's going to start pinning more murders on David Berkowitz (I might just faint). To recap, here’s a passage from Manny's initial post regarding the matter:

 

His audience seems eager to explore this new line of inquiry as long as it's strictly speculative.

 

But first, Manny has to make something clear, and this goes back to the last post where "Mike Cotton" was saying the quiet parts out loud:

This Mike Cotton character is really fixated on the cult theory. He wants his "lone gunman" and he's not going to stop until every last man, woman and child has heard and accepted with the Good Word of Manny Grossman! He's like a missionary for the cause. Just re-read that last part; "maybe enough evidence could sway the opinion of at least some of the people who buy into it."

Mike. There is not going to be any "evidence". Manny has made it clear that this is going to be a purely speculative endeavor. Also, what part of "utterly demolished" do you not understand?

(By the way, in my last post on this topic, I did go on a bit of a rant at the end. It's just that I just keep seeing people insist that there was no way a blood-thirsty killer would or could join a cult that called for violence and murder in the streets. I can agree to disagree if an idea or theory comes close enough to being reasonable. That's not reasonable. You guys need to think of a new reason why David "JOINER" Berkowitz wouldn't join a fucking death cult.)

Okay, that pretty much brings us up to speed. The people have spoken, Manny has listened, so he's moving forward with this project. A project purely speculative in nature. Once voting was closed, Manny offered the following:

Manny has no files, no evidence, no nothing. The case is a "lost cause". 

To be clear, Manny is not naming David Berkowitz as the killer. Oh no. David Berkowitz just happens to be the guy who Manny thinks did it. 

What? What's not to understand? He's not NAMING Berkowitz. But he's going to kinda-sorta name Berkowitz. It's like he's giving us an "off the record" assessment, except it's going to be on the record. 

Is he retarded?

“Alas,” this is the corner Manny has painted himself into. Am I splitting hairs here? Not at all, this is the lay of the land…

His analysis of Maury Terry/SOS/TUE has been blown out of the water. 

His Wendy Savino nonsense has been blown out of the water. 

Manny clearly believes that this time things will be different! By not naming (but naming) Berkowitz, he is finally above reproach. This is a fool-proof way to keep trolling a small community of amateur sleuths. Can’t lose. 

Moving along, Manny also had this to say:

Frank's friend Berowitz deserves to have random murders pinned on him...but don't forget, Manny is not NAMING Berkowitz. It's all speculation and there's nothing Frank can do about it. Hmph!

And he really said, "there's nothing you can do about it," lmao. It's Manny's party and he'll cry if he wants to!!

Manny is the same guy who once speculated that Maury Terry wrote The Ultimate Evil for revenge. I’m speculating that revenge is what has motivated Manny all along. 

Thanks for reading.

I LOVE THIS CROWD!!