As time rolls on, I have less and less doubt in my mind that little Luisa is the person whose name is redacted in the Nikolaj Amman police statements regarding the Alfred Hunt Howell incident.
So she can talk shit about him, his dad, people on his videos, but if he responds, it’s bullying. Don’t agree about posting her nudes, but she’s posted so much unsubstantiated crap about people, she’s certainly due to get some shit thrown back at her.
Nothing says, “I’m winning the argument,” quite like soliciting what is known as “revenge porn”.
The other night one of your allies also threatened her nursing license and hinted that they have more personal info on her than she herself has released.
If you want to debate, then debate. Keep it civil.
You asking to keep it civil. Were you civil in going after Paul personally on your comments, questioning his education or approving comments involving his child? I’m not questioning your comments on the substance of his book or investigation, but the comments you and your “allies” made regarding his personal and family situation, his ethnicity. Don’t take the moral high ground now because your internet crush is finally being called out for all the bs she’s spewed. I don’t endorse publishing personal information of any sort, and don’t need to watch her ex relationship meltdown, but she never had a problem doing it and you never had a problem with her doing it either.
You are cherry-picking and making false equivalences. And I’m not surprised because there’s always one set of rules for the “Terry Heads” and another set for the scumbags.
None of my “allies” threatened anyone’s livelihood. Not once. So fuck you. You guys don’t want to discuss or debate, you want to bully and , you hope, demoralize people.
One of Paul’s groupies brought his personal life into it, saying people had no right to criticize his book because he’d “been through enough”. That’s a load of crap.
I publicly stated that if Paul is going through a hard time then my heart goes out on a personal level. You skipped that. And why wouldn’t you? Otherwise you wouldn’t have an argument.
How is revenge porn which is illegal in about 30 states acceptable retaliation to conflicts of interest being brought up by Dana? And chronic and blatant confabulations and lies?
I'm also sick of the binary labeling, calling people who believe the multiple shooter theory are "Terry Heads". You can accept the multiple shooter theory while still being constructively critical regarding his research. Life works on a sliding scale. If it doesn't for you, then seek therapy.
Comparing apples to oranges.
This is exactly why all the decent researchers bailed from the online groups and took it offline. All the fighting is only a way to divert attention from more important issues and keep people demoralized. . .
P.S. Manny is a fuck muffin for advocating revenge porn. And no one wants to hear about your break up publicly, Manny. Keep that for your friends. Your audience is not your friends.
As time rolls on, I have less and less doubt in my mind that little Luisa is the person whose name is redacted in the Nikolaj Amman police statements regarding the Alfred Hunt Howell incident.
ReplyDeleteTD
"A drunk bipolar mental case".
ReplyDeleteLooks like Grossman is getting his Carnegie on like usual, winning friends and influencing people. Acting like a douche canoe.
This post says more about Grossman and his chronic need for attention, whether positive or negative, than Dana.
The post also reflects zero emotional intelligence.
Pretty sure it was Thatcher said said when you start being attacked personally that you've won the argument.
And, if Dana is bipolar? Take is as a compliment. Soaring IQs for people who suffer from the disorder.
Effin pitiful.
What am I missing? Does someone claim to have nudes pictures of Dana? And Manny is promoting posting them? Bullying?
ReplyDeleteWow. He really hit rock bottom on this post.
Where is Manny make this post? Twitter, Facebook? The post needs to be reported and his account banned.
ReplyDeleteSo she can talk shit about him, his dad, people on his videos, but if he responds, it’s bullying. Don’t agree about posting her nudes, but she’s posted so much unsubstantiated crap about people, she’s certainly due to get some shit thrown back at her.
ReplyDeleteNothing says, “I’m winning the argument,” quite like soliciting what is known as “revenge porn”.
DeleteThe other night one of your allies also threatened her nursing license and hinted that they have more personal info on her than she herself has released.
If you want to debate, then debate. Keep it civil.
You asking to keep it civil. Were you civil in going after Paul personally on your comments, questioning his education or approving comments involving his child? I’m not questioning your comments on the substance of his book or investigation, but the comments you and your “allies” made regarding his personal and family situation, his ethnicity. Don’t take the moral high ground now because your internet crush is finally being called out for all the bs she’s spewed. I don’t endorse publishing personal information of any sort, and don’t need to watch her ex relationship meltdown, but she never had a problem doing it and you never had a problem with her doing it either.
DeleteYou are cherry-picking and making false equivalences. And I’m not surprised because there’s always one set of rules for the “Terry Heads” and another set for the scumbags.
DeleteNone of my “allies” threatened anyone’s livelihood. Not once. So fuck you. You guys don’t want to discuss or debate, you want to bully and , you hope, demoralize people.
One of Paul’s groupies brought his personal life into it, saying people had no right to criticize his book because he’d “been through enough”. That’s a load of crap.
I publicly stated that if Paul is going through a hard time then my heart goes out on a personal level. You skipped that. And why wouldn’t you? Otherwise you wouldn’t have an argument.
Btw, if anybody wants to check me on this, the comments in question regarding Paul are in this post:
Deletehttps://sonofsamfiles.blogspot.com/2024/08/reader-mail.html
I knew all about the panic-stricken lobbying going on which is why I approved the comment in the first place.
I'm lost.
DeleteHow is revenge porn which is illegal in about 30 states acceptable retaliation to conflicts of interest being brought up by Dana? And chronic and blatant confabulations and lies?
I'm also sick of the binary labeling, calling people who believe the multiple shooter theory are "Terry Heads". You can accept the multiple shooter theory while still being constructively critical regarding his research. Life works on a sliding scale. If it doesn't for you, then seek therapy.
Comparing apples to oranges.
This is exactly why all the decent researchers bailed from the online groups and took it offline. All the fighting is only a way to divert attention from more important issues and keep people demoralized. . .
P.S. Manny is a fuck muffin for advocating revenge porn. And no one wants to hear about your break up publicly, Manny. Keep that for your friends. Your audience is not your friends.
I’ve been meaning to address something you said- I don’t blame people for taking it offline. At all.
DeleteThe “community” has always had it’s share of moles and troublemakers and it just keeps getting worse.